Analytics Consent

We use analytics to understand better how people are using this site.

Permit Google Analytics?

Yes No
Skip to main content
Read page text
page 22
INDEX ON CENSORSHIP   |   VOL.52   |   NO.4 Shot by both sides MARTIN BRIGHT talks to the Russian artists fighting cancellation from inside Russia – and outside IN THE WEEKS after the Russian invasion of Ukraine, writer Linor Goralik was overwhelmed with a feeling of uselessness. Based in Israel since 2014, she saw fellow Russianspeakers expressing their opposition to President Vladimir Putin’s aggression on individual Facebook, Instagram and Telegram accounts. Speaking from her home in Ramat Gan, near Tel Aviv, Goralik told Index she decided to draw on what she had learned during her years working as a marketing consultant. “I thought, ‘OK, I have this one skill: sometimes I can organise things.’ I had this feeling that, brought together, these voices would sound much louder.” So it was that ROAR (Russian Oppositional Arts Review) was born. Launched in April 2022, its mission was ambitious: “To introduce its readers to the artefacts of the contemporary Russian-language culture – from poetry to music scores, from articles to fiction, from web design objects to art reproductions, graffiti and short videos – opposing the loyalist and servile official culture, which in extremes merges with the blatant propaganda serving the current criminal political regime in Russia.” Since then, ROAR has published 10 editions and stands as a testament to the vibrancy of Russian oppositional culture, precisely as its founding document promised. One video installation by the Bezliky Project – A Dialogue With a Birch Tree – included in the latest collection shows a winter landscape of birches, the Russian national symbol. These are intercut with shots of the words Mir (Peace), Svoboda (Freedom), Zakon (Law), Pravo (Rights) and Mozhno (Possibility) scribbled out with a marker. The blacked-out words are then stuck on the bodies of two anonymous female figures dressed in white bodysuits (bezliky is Russian for “faceless”). As they walk across a bridge to stand outside the Power Station 2 Arts Hub in Moscow, each figure throws away a birch log. The symbolism is heavy, but this is unquestionably a bold act of opposition. Goralik has long been persona non grata in Russia. She left her home city of Dnipropetrovsk (now Dnipro in Ukraine) towards the end of the Soviet era when she was still a teenager. She and her parents settled in Israel, but Goralik split her life between Moscow and Tel Aviv from 2000 until just before Russia invaded Crimea in 2014. By that time the writer had become the target of a campaign on Russian TV and newspapers, where she was labelled unpatriotic. And yet, despite her impeccable pedigree as a figure of the anti-Putin resistance, a dissident artist and founder of perhaps the most important post-invasion arts review, Goralnik has still found herself the subject of the boycott against Russian culture. Earlier this year, the organisers of the Prima Vista literature festival in Tartu, Estonia, were forced to withdraw an invitation to Goralnik after objections from Ukrainian writers. These included Ukrainian poet Olena Huseinov, the writer-in-residence at Tartu in its This might be the first thing that we have to realise. It hurts capacity as Unesco City of Literature. In a tortuous statement, the festival said: “The Prima Vista organising team has had no reason to doubt Linor Goralik’s opposition to Putin and support for Ukraine, but given the tensions and reactions that have arisen, we currently see no other solution than to cancel her performances. We still consider it important to offer freedom of speech and opportunities for discussion, but in order to alleviate tensions, we must make difficult choices. Above all, we must show strong support for Ukraine in this war.” Goralik has chosen to stay silent about this cancellation, and provided no comment to Index about it. On the principle of boycotting Russian culture, she was more forthcoming. She said it was important to understand the context of pain and grief during wartime. “I am not a sociologist or an anthropologist, but as a private person I always try to start with the human level. I always try to begin not just with what people say or write or demand or do. I try to put myself in their shoes and ask myself what they feel,” she said. The Hamas attacks of 7 October have given her a particular perspective. “I can’t imagine what Ukrainian people may feel concerning everything Russian,” she said. “But I talk to so many Israelis in these horrible days and we talk a lot about what we feel concerning people that many of us perceive as our enemies. “I think that people who demand to boycott the culture of their enemies feel tremendous pain. It starts with pain. When somebody breaks you, hurts you, kills your children, does unbelievable things to your country, you don’t want to hear their language. Ever.” She added: “This might be the first thing that we have to realise. It hurts. It’s not about logic. It’s not about culture. First of all, it fucking hurts. This is not my attempt to say that we should ignore the logical discourses that stand behind the demands... not in any way. But I’m trying to say that on top of what they C R E D I T: A r t u r W i d a k / N u r P h o t o / G e t t y 20  INDEXONCENSORSHIP.ORG
page 23
Features ABOVE: A Ukrainian protests Russian band Little Big, despite the band’s opposition to Putin say, there are things they probably feel.” However, she said that it was important to distinguish between a boycott of compromised Russian institutions and the cancelling of individual Russians. “When they demand to cut connections with Russian institutions, they might be right because there are not many independent institutions in Russia right now. And you should look very closely at every institution in Russia to understand what specific people stand behind the initiatives and what are the roots of that. But when they say stop contacts with people, specific people, because they speak Russian, it’s very hard for me to hear because I’m Jewish. I don’t like this talk. We Jews have a very long memory.” Goralik is not the only Putin opponent to face cancellation simply for being Russian. New Yorker journalist Masha Gessen has written widely about Putin’s authoritarian regime. Even so, earlier this year, celebrated novelist and Index award winner Andrey Kurkov had to face criticism from fellow Ukrainian writers when he agreed to appear on a platform at the Toronto International Festival of Authors with Gessen. This was not Kurkov’s first brush with controversy. Last year, he shared a stage with Mikhail Shishkin, a bestselling Russian writer who is also a renowned critic of Putin. Kurkov told Index that he received hundreds of attacks. He was called a collaborator, a traitor and even a Russian agent. Meanwhile, Russian-speaking Ukrainian filmmaker Sergei Loznitsa has found himself isolated for opposing the cancellation of Russian filmmakers. In March 2022, he was expelled from the Ukrainian Film Academy for refusing to support a boycott. Ukrainian activists at the Cancel Russia movement argue that → INDEXONCENSORSHIP.ORG   21

Page Text

View plaintext

INDEX ON CENSORSHIP   |   VOL.52   |   NO.4

Shot by both sides

MARTIN BRIGHT talks to the Russian artists fighting cancellation from inside Russia – and outside

IN THE WEEKS after the Russian invasion of Ukraine, writer Linor Goralik was overwhelmed with a feeling of uselessness. Based in Israel since 2014, she saw fellow Russianspeakers expressing their opposition to President Vladimir Putin’s aggression on individual Facebook, Instagram and Telegram accounts. Speaking from her home in Ramat Gan, near Tel Aviv, Goralik told Index she decided to draw on what she had learned during her years working as a marketing consultant.

“I thought, ‘OK, I have this one skill: sometimes I can organise things.’ I had this feeling that, brought together, these voices would sound much louder.”

So it was that ROAR (Russian Oppositional Arts Review) was born. Launched in April 2022, its mission was ambitious: “To introduce its readers to the artefacts of the contemporary Russian-language culture – from poetry to music scores, from articles to fiction, from web design objects to art reproductions, graffiti and short videos – opposing the loyalist and servile official culture, which in extremes merges with the blatant propaganda serving the current criminal political regime in Russia.”

Since then, ROAR has published 10 editions and stands as a testament to the vibrancy of Russian oppositional culture, precisely as its founding document promised. One video installation by the Bezliky Project – A Dialogue With a Birch Tree – included in the latest collection shows a winter landscape of birches, the Russian national symbol. These are intercut with shots of the words Mir (Peace), Svoboda (Freedom), Zakon (Law), Pravo (Rights) and Mozhno (Possibility) scribbled out with a marker. The blacked-out words are then stuck on the bodies of two anonymous female figures dressed in white bodysuits (bezliky is Russian for “faceless”). As they walk across a bridge to stand outside the Power Station 2 Arts Hub in Moscow, each figure throws away a birch log. The symbolism is heavy, but this is unquestionably a bold act of opposition.

Goralik has long been persona non grata in Russia. She left her home city of Dnipropetrovsk (now Dnipro in Ukraine) towards the end of the Soviet era when she was still a teenager. She and her parents settled in Israel, but Goralik split her life between Moscow and Tel Aviv from 2000 until just before Russia invaded Crimea in 2014.

By that time the writer had become the target of a campaign on Russian TV and newspapers, where she was labelled unpatriotic. And yet, despite her impeccable pedigree as a figure of the anti-Putin resistance, a dissident artist and founder of perhaps the most important post-invasion arts review, Goralnik has still found herself the subject of the boycott against Russian culture.

Earlier this year, the organisers of the Prima Vista literature festival in Tartu, Estonia, were forced to withdraw an invitation to Goralnik after objections from Ukrainian writers. These included Ukrainian poet Olena Huseinov, the writer-in-residence at Tartu in its

This might be the first thing that we have to realise. It hurts capacity as Unesco City of Literature. In a tortuous statement, the festival said: “The Prima Vista organising team has had no reason to doubt Linor Goralik’s opposition to Putin and support for Ukraine, but given the tensions and reactions that have arisen, we currently see no other solution than to cancel her performances. We still consider it important to offer freedom of speech and opportunities for discussion, but in order to alleviate tensions, we must make difficult choices. Above all, we must show strong support for Ukraine in this war.”

Goralik has chosen to stay silent about this cancellation, and provided no comment to Index about it. On the principle of boycotting Russian culture, she was more forthcoming. She said it was important to understand the context of pain and grief during wartime.

“I am not a sociologist or an anthropologist, but as a private person I always try to start with the human level. I always try to begin not just with what people say or write or demand or do. I try to put myself in their shoes and ask myself what they feel,” she said.

The Hamas attacks of 7 October have given her a particular perspective.

“I can’t imagine what Ukrainian people may feel concerning everything Russian,” she said. “But I talk to so many Israelis in these horrible days and we talk a lot about what we feel concerning people that many of us perceive as our enemies.

“I think that people who demand to boycott the culture of their enemies feel tremendous pain. It starts with pain. When somebody breaks you, hurts you, kills your children, does unbelievable things to your country, you don’t want to hear their language. Ever.”

She added: “This might be the first thing that we have to realise. It hurts. It’s not about logic. It’s not about culture. First of all, it fucking hurts. This is not my attempt to say that we should ignore the logical discourses that stand behind the demands... not in any way. But I’m trying to say that on top of what they

C R E D I

T:

A r t u r

W i d a k /

N u r P h o t o /

G e t t y

20  INDEXONCENSORSHIP.ORG

read next page

My Bookmarks

Buy this Book
Skip to main content