The Gramophone, September, 1923
and of hearing with relief the proposal to go down and see the first division row at six o'clock, and then of finding that Donald Tovey was to come too. I can see him now crossing the High and conducting an imaginary orchestra as he walked along, and I can see disapproving undergraduates with their relatives and friends turning round to stare at him in the SI.lUl ight of a May afternoon. I can remember wondering why we should be plagued with a musical genius during Eights week and if i t would not be possible to stop his making such an exhibition of himself by conducting an imaginary orchestra and tooting to himself like a cracked French horn, and I recall my embadassment and dismay when the ghost!)r scherzo he. was conducting involved an unusual energy of movement and he nearly conducted a young woman's hat off her head as we passed along towards the barges. It is really lamentable that the whole of my musical life at the University should consist in retrospect of being bored by Pomp and Ci1'cumstance played on the piano, and of being bored by Donald Tovey's behaviour in public. I can remember picking up from a musical friend's mantelpiece a programme of the Oxford Musical Club and thanking God, with a shudder, that I was not like these musical people on reading that some trio or quartet of Beethoven would be the t i t-bit that week.
Then I remember going up to Cambridge during the Long Vacation to play in a dialogue of Thomas Heywood, called W orke for Cutlers, which had been discovered in the l ibrary of Trinity Hall. The parts were Rapier, Sword and Dagger. I played Rapier, and carried a genuine rapier of Elizabethan t imes, a tremendous weapon to manage gracefully, for i t must have been more than 6ft. long. We performed the piece as a Pastoral in the Hall garden, and to help out the stilted old dialogue Mr. Doimetsch was there with his orchestra. I believe that I was genuinely enchanted by the music, which was all of the period, and I was certainly enchanted by the antique instruments like the viola d'amore and viola da gamba, and the lute. When I got back to Oxford the following term I announced to my friends that at last I had discovered what I really l iked in music; and I begin to wonder nowadays if some of my would-be extremely musical friends who affirm that they can only stand Bach are not really in the same development of musical taste that I was in when I was twenty, because so often when they are tackled one finds that they are not really musical, and that the pleasure they claim to be getting from Bach is only the pleasure of l i terary association, the same kind of pleasure that I got, and still get, from a pre-Raphaelite painting. Of course I am not referring to people who, having experienced all music, return at last to Bach; but I am always suspicious of perfect taste that has not been reached by leagues of bad taste. I do not believe that, unless one has at some t ime or another revelled in Macaulay's Lays or Longfellow'S Psalm of Life, one can possibly enjoy the best poetry, except as snobs may enj,oy the company of earls, or parvenus the best vintages of champagne. The way beauty reveals i tself to mankind is the way the sun comes in wintert ime, shedding for a brief moment a few pale rays, touching with indescribable magic the cold scene, and a moment afterward retiring behind a grey waste of clouds. Most of us have perceived in early youth the beauty of a line of poetry that is definitely one of the great beautiful lines in the l i terature of the world; but why that particular line should have been appreciated when others equally beautiful werEpassed over unheard by the imagination i t would puzzle more than a Freudian to discover. And so with music; most of us can look back to something in great music that moved us before we were really moved by all great music as a matter of course; my own example would be that lncarnatus from the Mozart Mass.
The fatal thing that happens to so many people in the adventure of taste is the way they find that they suddenly like something which they remember was considered good some years before they liked i t . What can I take as an instance? Let us say Rubinstein's Melody in F. Perhaps at an early age they have heard Rubinstein's Melody in F on the violin or violoncello or piano and were bored to death by i t , whereas their parents or guardians hummed i t on the way home from the concert. Ten years later, in their turn, they find themselves enraptured by the iYeZody in F, and in a burst of self-congratulation they fancy that they have achieved something and reached a landmark in their intellectual progress, and from that moment they are sorry for anybody that cannot be enraptured by Rubinstein's lYelody in F. It is the same in l i terature and painting. For one's own pleasure I am sure that i t is a mistake to have exquisite taste in all the arts. For the rest of my life I intend to be quite impenitent about music and painting, and never to allow myself to get beyond works of art that still delight me, though I know them to be far removed from the first rank. I have reached a standard in judging poetry which is like the top of a mountain above the lcvel of perpetual snow in i ts discouraging and monotonous perfection. I pick up volumes by contemporary poets whom I have heard praised by people who ought to know better. I gather a handful of poems and carry them up to my mountain-top to comparc them with the snow at the summit. But the artificial snow I have gathered melts in my hand long before I reach the summit. Yet what a great deal of harmless pleasure might be. mine if I had worse taste and was not firmly convinced that great English verse died with Shelley. Even now, such power have day-