Skip to main content
Read page text
page 12
f o r e i g n p a r t s where his plant stood, made into a separate ‘city’, so that the company’s taxes were not swallowed up by the wider urban need. Binelli is clear-eyed about the greed and frailty that contributed to Detroit’s slide, and cynical about the planners who arrive with blueprints for restoration. Dystopia attracts utopians. He finds (in some cases literally) green shoots of recovery: urban gardens, a thriving school for pregnant teenagers, and artists, lured to the city by cheap property (some homes have lost 95 per cent of their value) and by a hunger for urban cool. The term ‘ruin porn’ crept into the local language to describe the voyeurism of outsiders arriving to gape at and photograph the post-apocalyptic scenes. Models posed before the devastation; film-makers were lured with tax breaks – Detroit was to be the ‘Hollywood of the Mid West’ – but they rapidly departed once the tax regime changed. Northern Europeans (though not Brits) have, apparently, a particular fascination with the city. ‘Why are you here?’ Binelli asks a German student. ‘I came to see the end of the world,’ he replies. Others come as ‘urban explorers’ (‘urbexers’), crawling their way into disused structures such as the vast, abandoned Packard car plant. Here they encounter post-industrial entrepreneurs, the ‘scrappers’, stripping from the buildings what their greatgrandfathers had so diligently installed. Binelli is at his best when he reports what it is really like to live in his home town. There is a hilarious but terrifying account of a class for people applying for permits to carry concealed weapons. Students are eager to know when it is legitimate for them to shoot intruders. On being told that they should at least wait for the intruder to break in, one disappointed woman asks if she can shoot first and then drag the body inside. A cop had suggested the idea. Binelli is rightly (and righteously) angry at the treatment of the city by the powers that be. Banks may be too big to fail, but not cities. He makes a telling analogy with the US practice of ‘isolating enemy states financially and then watching the leader whom we’ve labeled a tyrant act more and more like one as his regime begins to crumble … Detroit was the rogue state.’ Spending cuts lead inexorably to a spiral of decline, and those who impose them are either blind or wilful. Binelli spends nights in a fire station relocated, after the closure of the real firehouses, to an abandoned warehouse, learning the wisdom of the firefighters who, for paltry wages, put their lives on the line for their community. The value of this book lies, however, not just in its compelling story, but in its lessons for all in the West. Detroit is not a faraway city of which we know little. It may be ahead in its fateful journey towards implosion, but it is not unlike many British communities (coal miners, shipbuilders, steelmakers) whose utility to wider society has now faded. There is no room for smugness. Pulling together what encouraging signs he can find (and they are precious few), Binelli declares that Detroit does have a pioneering future – the first successful mass-production city will become the first successful post-mass-production city. ‘The truth is,’ he writes, ‘my optimism was proving tenacious. I couldn’t say why.’ Having followed him every step of the way, nor could I. After what has gone before, Mark Binelli’s optimism must lie in the DNA of a son of Detroit. The evidence, sadly, belies his conclusion. To order this book for £16, see the Literary Review bookshop on page 45 Literary Review | f e b r u a r y 2 0 1 3 10
page 13
b i o g r a p h y a r i a n e b a n k e s Front Lines David Jones in the Great War By Thomas Dilworth (Enitharmon Press 228pp £15) When the artist David Jones’s book- length meditation on the Great War, In Parenthesis, was published in 1937 by Faber, it established him immediately as one of the most singular poets of the day. T S Eliot, who championed Jones at Faber, was delighted to discover in this ‘work of genius’ an entirely original voice, one that combined a startling modernism with a sensibility drenched in myth and history. The 40,000-word epic of prose and verse that reimagined Jones’s experiences as a private at the Western Front with extraordinary immediacy and depth was garlanded with praise, winning the Hawthornden Prize in 1938, then the only literary prize worth winning. By the late 1920s David Jones was already considered England’s foremost engraver and an artist of note: Ben Nicholson set about recruiting him for the Seven and Five Society (members included Nicholson’s wife Winifred, Christopher Wood and Barbara Hepworth), and he was starting to exhibit with success in London’s major galleries. But his memories of war, the defining episode of his youth, had been simmering beneath the surface, and he was spurred to embark on his own account after reading Remarque’s All Quiet on the Western Front: ‘Bugger it, I can do better than that,’ he was heard to say. At the heart of In Parenthesis lies the question of the meaning of the conflict, and his framing of that conundrum, however allusive its form, was to cost Jones dearly: he suffered a complete breakdown on completing the first draft in 1932, and the depression that ensued and was to snap at his heels for the rest of his life accounted for the delay in publication until 1937. Given the pervasive influence of Jones’s wartime experiences on his life and work, Thomas Dilworth has chosen in this study to focus exclusively on these years, mining both interviews and records to describe Jones’s everyday activities, and amplifying his story with photos and early writings never published before. The young private was, by his own account,‘not only amateur, but grotesquely incompetent, a knocker-over of piles, a parade’s despair’. Recruited at 19 (but looking much younger), he was certainly at that point naive, romantic, even jingoistic, as his published war drawings in The Graphic – reproduced here for the first time since publication – attest. But unlike the average squaddie, Jones was already steeped in literature, as Dilworth makes clear. As a boy and young art student at Camberwell School of Art, he had devoured works of English and Welsh myth and history, the ‘Mass’, 1917 Romantic poets, Shakespeare, Malory’s Morte d ’Arthur, the Chanson de Roland; not only did these help to frame his poetic imagination, but they were to provide the deep perspective that marked In Parenthesis out from other poetry of the Great War. Jones was also developing as an artist, seizing every opportunity to sketch the devastated landscape in which he found a ‘beauty of a strange sort that … remains imprinted on the mind forever’. More vivid still are the drawings of his companions and officers, affectionately captured in fleeting bursts of action or moments of repose – even the trench rats put in an appearance, albeit dead. It was indeed the rough camaraderie of the battalion, the humour, the grit, the rich colloquial and Cockney language that he relished, and which compensated to an extent for ‘the futilities, stupidities and bestialities’ of warfare. (Army Cockney would inflect his speech for the rest of his life, as readers of his letters will recognise.) He flatly refused to accept a commission, claiming extreme incompetence, but in truth he considered the officer class to be arrogant and humourless. For him, it was principally the warmth and wit of his fellow ‘footsloggers’ that kept him going, and he was to rue the loss of that almost domestic intimacy as slaughter became increasingly mechanised after the Battle of the Somme. He was, in fact, a more efficient soldier than he ever admitted, and survived the Somme despite injury, returning after a romantically tinged recuperation to yet harsher conditions north of Ypres. Map-making,Field Survey and office-wallah work mitigated the terror and tedium of constant bombardment, allowed him more time for drawing, writing and reflection, and played a part in his surviving the infernos of Ypres and Passchendaele. He fell ill with trench fever in 1917. His war ended in Limerick, where his battalion was posted to hold the line again, this time against the rebel Volunteers. Wholly in favour of Irish independence himself, Jones was seduced by the beauty of the landscape, language and local girls, and these last months of the war would cement his romantic identification with the Celtic world. Thomas Dilworth is the pre-eminent scholar of Jones and is preparing a fulllength life. As such, he is alert to the wider significance of every incident, as when, searching for firewood in ‘a wasted land of ubiquitous mud and rusted iron’, Jones stumbles upon a candlelit celebration of the Roman Catholic Mass in a broken byre – a moment of pure epiphany. Yet Dilworth postpones the full unravelling of such episodes to his forthcoming biography, restricting himself here to conjuring up the daily blood, sweat and tears of Jones’s war. It was the crucible in which his rare poetic sensibility was tempered, and there are tantalising glimpses of what he would make of it. What it eventually made of him, we will have to wait for the full life to discover. To order this book for £12, see the Literary Review bookshop on page 45 f e b r u a r y 2 0 1 3 | Literary Review 11

Page Text

View plaintext

f o r e i g n p a r t s where his plant stood, made into a separate ‘city’, so that the company’s taxes were not swallowed up by the wider urban need.

Binelli is clear-eyed about the greed and frailty that contributed to Detroit’s slide, and cynical about the planners who arrive with blueprints for restoration. Dystopia attracts utopians. He finds (in some cases literally) green shoots of recovery: urban gardens, a thriving school for pregnant teenagers, and artists, lured to the city by cheap property (some homes have lost 95 per cent of their value) and by a hunger for urban cool.

The term ‘ruin porn’ crept into the local language to describe the voyeurism of outsiders arriving to gape at and photograph the post-apocalyptic scenes. Models posed before the devastation; film-makers were lured with tax breaks – Detroit was to be the ‘Hollywood of the Mid West’ – but they rapidly departed once the tax regime changed.

Northern Europeans (though not Brits) have, apparently, a particular fascination with the city. ‘Why are you here?’ Binelli asks a German student. ‘I came to see the end of the world,’ he replies. Others come as ‘urban explorers’ (‘urbexers’), crawling their way into disused structures such as the vast, abandoned Packard car plant. Here they encounter post-industrial entrepreneurs, the ‘scrappers’, stripping from the buildings what their greatgrandfathers had so diligently installed.

Binelli is at his best when he reports what it is really like to live in his home town. There is a hilarious but terrifying account of a class for people applying for permits to carry concealed weapons. Students are eager to know when it is legitimate for them to shoot intruders. On being told that they should at least wait for the intruder to break in, one disappointed woman asks if she can shoot first and then drag the body inside. A cop had suggested the idea.

Binelli is rightly (and righteously) angry at the treatment of the city by the powers that be. Banks may be too big to fail, but not cities. He makes a telling analogy with the US practice of ‘isolating enemy states financially and then watching the leader whom we’ve labeled a tyrant act more and more like one as his regime begins to crumble … Detroit was the rogue state.’

Spending cuts lead inexorably to a spiral of decline, and those who impose them are either blind or wilful. Binelli spends nights in a fire station relocated, after the closure of the real firehouses, to an abandoned warehouse, learning the wisdom of the firefighters who, for paltry wages, put their lives on the line for their community.

The value of this book lies, however, not just in its compelling story, but in its lessons for all in the West. Detroit is not a faraway city of which we know little. It may be ahead in its fateful journey towards implosion, but it is not unlike many British communities (coal miners, shipbuilders, steelmakers) whose utility to wider society has now faded. There is no room for smugness.

Pulling together what encouraging signs he can find (and they are precious few), Binelli declares that Detroit does have a pioneering future – the first successful mass-production city will become the first successful post-mass-production city. ‘The truth is,’ he writes, ‘my optimism was proving tenacious. I couldn’t say why.’ Having followed him every step of the way, nor could I. After what has gone before, Mark Binelli’s optimism must lie in the DNA of a son of Detroit. The evidence, sadly, belies his conclusion. To order this book for £16, see the Literary Review bookshop on page 45

Literary Review | f e b r u a r y 2 0 1 3 10

read next page

My Bookmarks

Buy this Book
Skip to main content