Goodbye dolly TABITHA MOSES REVEALS THE SERIOUS SIDE
All cultures mark the boundarybetween life and death with imitative rituals. Dolls are familiar
figures in funerals across time. The tombs of the
ancient dead are filled with effigies whose
assumed purpose ranges from the talismanic
to the admonitory. Children use dolls to play at death, mimicking grief and burial. Dolls, indeed, look like death. It is not just that in them we find an appropriate figure for our mourning, but, in their cold imperturbability, they seem like corpses themselves. The doll-corpse link is explored in Andrew
Köötting's playful and serious project, In theWake of
a Dead Dad, 2006. Intrigued by his reaction to his
father's corpse and memory, Köötting reinvented sev
eral imitative rituals, which included inviting responses to photographs of his dad in stages of life and death; laying himself out as mock-corpse and paternal offering in the Mexican Day-of-the-Dead; and creating an enormous inflatable Dead Dad doll with which he lived and travelled for several months. With a different sort of wit and tenderness, Tabitha
Kyoko Moses also explores the humanity and deathliness
of dolls. Over the past few years, Moses has amassed an
eclectic assortment of doll-objects from charity shops and jumble sales. “I wasn't interested in a particular genre of
doll,” she says, “or in creating a collection or a history. But
suddenly I discovered I had a lot of them. It was almost as if
they found me.” The dolls that ‘found’ Moses are those that
are most lost: blemished or dismembered, loved or tortured to the point of collapse. Inspired by a mummified girl she encountered during a residence at Bolton Museum, Moses initially began to re-fashion the dolls as consolatory gifts for this long-dead and lonely child. But her dolls began to take on a material life of their own. In a process of wrapping and nurturing she compares to “laying out a dead body” Moses
swaddles her dolls in lagging, plastic, printed cotton lawn,
stiff leather, string and human hair. A doll whose jolly bon
net and rosy cheeks form a startling contrast to her eye's
bald sockets is fondly adorned with a manx-cat brooch, suggesting both completion and absence. Some of the dolls have the cosy air of children sleeping. Others appear to be slightly disgruntled, futilely struggling against the fabric bundles in which they find themselves enclosed. The fabric wrappings are crucial to the new life that Moses lends her dolls. These textiles are both ornament and
container: the dolls' soft coffin and their decorative memori
al. Moses binds a startled bride wearing full wedding regalia
Ben Blackall
in dark linen. In her black shroud she becomes a figure of arrested potential, conveying the ritual proximity of marriage
and death. Moses further excavates the deathliness of dolls
with the use of x-ray photography. A light-box image of the
bride reveals her to be pierced with several pins. She now
resonates with murderous curiosity, internal anguish, guilt and fascination. For who, in moments of dark childhood fantasy, has not killed their dolls? InUntitled, 2006 Moses uses stitch as a communicative medium between life and death. These dismembered limbs, with their immaculate embroidery, are textiles of breathtaking beauty. Yet out of the
gorgeous doll-things protrude ugly human bones. Doll
and corpse become one in objects that are both
compelling and repellent. Moses' embroidered
calico, fashioned with such skill and care, lends respect and tenderness to the bone, and the bone in turn enhances the meanings of the fabric with its own brand of the grotesque. In contrast to Cindy Sherman's doll-art which, in the public glare of her camera, strives unsuccessfully to be poignant as well as disgusting, Moses' dolls achieve this by
expressing themselves intimately, stitching their
audience up with whispers.•••Kate Davies
30
industry
Peel back JOCELYN WARNER IS STUCK ON WALLPAPER
selvedge.org
www.stephanielevy.com
Wallpaper / pattern, pattern / wallpaper – like the
chicken and the egg, you can't have one without the other – well you can but stencilling is currently a prisonable offence. In many ways the revival of wallpaper is also a revival of pattern. The current resurgence follows a design period noted for its clean lines and surfaces and avoidance of overt decoration; most textile designs in the 1980s were a pared down reflection of classical themes. Graduating in the mid 80s it was
almost impossible to sell a decorative design in the UK;
Europeans, especially the Italians were a little more
receptive. The contrast today could not be more striking: pattern prevails in fast moving fashion and design trends and consumers are confident using patterned wallpaper to create an individual style. Perhaps it was the dawn of a new millennium or a desire to bring nature inside and embrace its reassuring qualities? There are parallels in the Arts and Crafts and Art Nouveau periods when nature played an
important part in creating new aesthetic content and
repeat structures. The desire to represent nature and
imbue interiors with the 'feel' of the outdoors is best communicated by wallpaper where the pattern can be seen in full, rather than hidden in the folds of draped fabric; as a result wallpaper has become a vehicle for designers from all creative disciplines. The ‘paper’ side of wallpaper is often overlooked yet part of wallpaper’s beauty is the quality of the printed image; paper provides a crisp and fresh edge and
allows inks to shine and reflect light. The same print on
fabric would look different. Of course wallpaper began
life mimicking fabric, but today wallpapers are about the feel and look of paper, its graphic and 'stationary' attributes. There are other advantages too, the costs of
creating a collection of designs is reduced by working
on paper rather than cloth. Arguably paper also grants designers a greater sense of freedom, encouraging experimentation. We are so used to paper coming in rolls with a standard width of 52cm to the new wide width papers, up to 135cm, pioneered by designers such as Timorous Beasties that it’s easy to forget that the first humble wallpapers were block printed onto small
squares. These were painstakingly stuck together to
create 'wallpaper' and sold through stationery shops
that also sold writing paper and music scores. It wasn't until developments in the paper industry led to continuous paper that the roll of wallpaper was born. The first commercially printed papers were made by highly skilled craftsmen who hand carved patterns onto wooden (often pear wood) blocks. Block printing was valued for the depth and body of colour; William Morris so valued the craft that he chose to continue
long after the arrival of machine printing. The surface
print machine (patented by the Lancashire firm Potters
and Rose in 1839) combined with the invention of continuous paper heralded a new era for wallpaper manufacture. By 1850 the surface printer was capable of printing perfectly registered patterns in up to eight colours. This was the beginning of affordable wallpaper; produced in high volumes in an enormous range of designs – as the huge pattern books of the time demonstrate.
The period from the end of the Second World War
to the mid-1970s was a high point for wallpapers.
The invention of screen printing techniques offered larger repeat sizes and textural effects. Innovative styles combined with radical architecture changed the
way wallpaper was used – the feature wall and open
plan living spaces were introduced. The Festival of
Britain showcased many of these contemporary
designs. Cole & Son set up one of the first ever screen printing studios in the late 1940s. One of the most impressive collections of the period was Palladio, in production from 1955-1975. It featured work by designers such as Lucienne Day, Deryck Healey and Roger and Richard Nicholson. Nevertheless the technique could accomodate only a small percentage of buyers. The larger market
bought mass-produced wallpapers. The introduction
of Photogravure and Flexographic printing in the
1960s saw volumes increase further. The high definition engraving techniques of Gravure and Flexo printing produced fine washes and tones; initially on vinyl. The new process met a rapidly increasing demand for wallpaper. In 1961 132 million rolls of wallpaper were sold, compared to 44 million in 1948. Collections were expanding, many contained over 50 designs with co-ordinating fabrics and plains.
The earlier innovative designs of this period were
soon overshadowed and diluted by mass production.
The lower end of the market was 'manufacturing' rather than 'design' led and collections were reduced to traditional small scale prints. Wallpaper became a
The clash DRIES VAN NOTEN GATHERS THE BRIGHT AND THE BEAUTIFUL
In 1986 Dries Van Noten touched downon the fashion runways of London presenting himself as the most user friendly of an elite class of graduates known as the ‘Antwerp Six’. This band of edgy young alumni from the Belgian Royal Academy of Fine Arts swooped into a jaded scene ripe for revolution. Enthusiasm for excessively wadded shoulders and super-sized
gilt buttons was waning and a counter trend emerged that signified
sobriety and intellectual muscle, rather than unlimited access to cash. The
sombre palettes and Hiroshima referent ‘bag lady’ aesthetic of an
advancing Japanese avant-garde provided fertile ground for the Antwerp designers to explore their inquisitional and de-constructionist methods. Unlike the severe work of his stable-mates Anne Demeulemeester and Dirk Bikkembergs, Dries Van Noten’s design embodied the more approach
able aspect of this new trend which, reasonably enough earned him a loyal following. Van Noten established a reputation for clothing that reflects clients cultural sensibilities; they in return recognise the historical and cultural references in Van Noten’s work and hold in high regard the labour of mind and body evident in its construction. To dress in Van Noten is to be
enveloped in an eclectic vision of sophisticated bohemia. Generally speak
ing the Van Noten ‘look’ is layered, relaxed and colourful. When put togeth
er with the confidence required to drive this loose limbed, rather languid
style, the result is assured and intelligent sexiness. Van Noten is inspired by the “beautiful things of this world” and aims to create clothes that will become a “mark of self esteem to the person who wears them”. In much of Van Noten’s design there is a strong relationship
with the aesthetic of Fin de Sièècle Orientalism. His use of luxurious and
abundant surface enrichment combined with informal styling reflects the
louche elegance of theatrically inspired designers of the early 20th century.
Avant-garde design of this period was concerned with more than just dress
ing bodies, designers such as Paul Poiret considered themselves artists. Van Noten’s surfaces are concentrated and intense, never thin or mean: in previous collections garments have been dyed, embroidered, dyed again then further embellished. The S/S 2008 collection moves away from Van Noten’s tradmark of embellishing materials into submission and instead loads printed blooms onto fine, summer breeze fabrics. If it is possible to remember a time when the quintessential English
garden vibrated with glorious colour and brilliant sunshine; then this collection
is the perfect illustration of that memory. Van Noten has chosen the most
exuberant of printed flora and arranged them into an artful cocktail of
pattern and vivid colour. A simple formula of progressively decreased trouser lengths, semi-fitted collared blouses, smart coats and wrapped tops forms the structure. Thrills are provided by the skillful gathering of large scale motifs reminiscent of painterly vintage prints and delicate, precise
oriental blossoms. A graphic flourish of Scandanavian pragmatism and
blocks of solid but luxuriously sumptuous semi-precious colour completes
this carefully contolled explosion.
Blues head the Van Noten bill: watered ultramarine, deep prussian and
polished cobalt all take leading roles supported by co-stars crocus yellow, bone, ginger, carmine and wisteria. Of course it has not been forgotten that the core colour of any garden is green and so this flowerfest is anchored with shades of bud, surf, fern and pale olive. The pinnacle of this summer delight is that these prints adorn in multiples. It sounds like a migraine but Van Noten has become so deft at combining colour and pattern it is possible to sport five different prints by
wearing just two pieces. As with his fellow print placement supremos
Jonathan Saunders and Eley Kishimoto, Van Noten is deliberate and considered
when it comes to positioning motifs and colour. Each element of the design
is placed exactly within the composition of the garment so that visual harmony is achieved and cluttered chaos is avoided. The level of visual and sensual fluency required to successfully mix these ingredients is testament to Van Noten’s talent, knowledge and creativity. •••Nicola Donovan
49
attire
01
02
04
Dress up THE STATE OF PLAY IN CHILDREN’S FASHION
Over the last 15 years,unlike some of our European counterparts, children’s clothing in the UK has been distinctly trend led with bright bubblegum colours and high fashion shapes dominating. There has been a loss of tradition, innocence and charm to the way children have been dressing. “Children’s clothes have become so much about logos and brash colours” says Fashion Director of Easy Living, Liz Thody “and like so much in our society there is no sense of longevity anymore.” Fortunately, fashion is fickle and a subversive element of small, individual makers have emerged
producing vintage inspired children’s clothing with a softer colour palette in kinder prettier styles using real
fabrics. “This change is definitely a backlash against the mass market. I also think that just as in the beau
ty industry, there are opportunities for small, niche brands to survive as people demand children’s clothes which are more original and quirky.” As Laura Ashley looked back to the Victorians for her children’s wear ranges of sprig print, pin-tucked dresses and frilly collared blouses, this generation are being informed by a previous era. “For forty something’s who were children in the early 60s, there is a nostalgia for the clothes they wore as children” says Thody. “It was also a time when women would not step out of the house without make- up and feeling the need to be well dressed.” Linda Mclean Fashion Director of Junior Magazine agrees “things that are coming through include pinafore dresses from the 60s, paisley’s from the 70s and batwing shapes from as
recently as the 80s.”
This reincarnation of the past is, however, a reinvention not a replication. A process of evolution has
occurred: the clothes embody the ‘essence’ of past looks rather than being faithful reproductions. As Thody reminisces “It is the quality of the details, the use of natural fabrics, hand-knits and the subtler colour palette that I remember about the clothes I wore as a child.” This sentiment is reflected in the
03
05
06
collections of the myriad online companies and individual labels that have emerged over the last couple of years. Surfing the websites, flicking through the brochures and visiting children’s boutiques in fashionable haunts, what you see is a plethora exquisitely charming prints, hand-knits, crocheted blankets, embroidery, appliquéé, rick rack braid and clothes that intentionally look skillfully home made. This may seem like a return to the stuff of traditional British children’s clothes from the era when children were seen and not heard and clothes were probably rather scratchy but although these clothes
reference picture books, fairy tales and the 1940s, they have a more casual, thrown together look – rather
than the stiff formality that ‘Nanny’ would have chosen.
Ex St Martin’s student Amynta Warde-Adam of Tulip and Nettle, started making children’s clothes because her son “didn’t want to wear a football strip and through a fascination with soliders’ uniforms decided he wanted to wear moleskin”. Her collection includes ‘hero’ breeches, ‘yum yum’ dresses, which are tied with Petersham ribbon, floral smocks, and gingham bloomers often with generous trimmings of original vintage ribbons called ‘anorak braid’ and ‘daisy trim’ that Warde-Adam picked up from a very old fashioned local supplier when it shut down. The collection is a real trip down memory lane to the days when nursery school was still all about nature tables and finger painting.
A more recently established company is Wintersweet, set up by textile designer Rebecca
Loxley who motivated by her “concern for the loss of traditional textiles used in everyday life in
the UK” created a collection of matinéée jackets, booties and fine cobweb shawls that is hand knitted in South America. This emphasis on traditional textiles is also an enduring theme for Eva Karayiannis, who established Caramel Baby and Child nine years ago. Karayiannis came from Greece to this