RECORDINGS OF THE YEAR
‘There is a sense of occasion and a burning purpose here that is missing from so many recordings of this work’
Jeremy Nicholas proclaims a new benchmark recording of Tchaikovsky’s first two piano concertos
Tchaikovsky Piano Concertos – No 1, Op 23; No 2, Op 44 Denis Matsuev pf Mariinsky Orchestra / Valery Gergiev Mariinsky F Í MAR0548 (79’ • DDD)
The B flat minor Concerto has been recorded so many times that you may justifiably ask if we really need another. For an answer, listen to this newcomer. There have been many very great accounts of it – Horowitz / Szell, Argerich / Abbado, Gilels / Mehta among them – but I doubt if you will ever hear it more viscerally thrilling and sumptuously engineered than here. Listening to Matsuev and Gergiev is the aural equivalent of watching Federer and Nadal, friends off the tennis court but ultra-competitive on it, each determined to outdo the other with supreme athleticism and an arsenal of exquisite passing shots.
After a conventional enough introduction, you start to notice deft little touches, such as the weight Matsuev gives to his attack at the top of the keyboard or the darting semiquaver runs at 5’23”, which he plays leggiero and with no pedal. Neither protagonist is anxious to linger sentimentally along the way and Gergiev, sometimes routine in concerto recordings, is here fiercely energised – giving as good as he gets, as it were, from his soloist – to the point after the orchestral tutti at 10’55” that you wonder how Matsuev is going to match him. But of course he does, and to hair-raising effect.
In the slow movement, the woodwindwriting and the piano’s sempre staccato passage over the cello solo at 2’02” are beautifully captured. The scherzo, again played with minimum pedal and maximum clarity, almost makes one gasp, Matsuev’s wonderful, gossamer-like touch bringing an unusual playfulness to proceedings. His martellato delivery of some passages throughout this muscular, virile performance sometimes risks going through the tone, and some may find his approach too relentless. Personally, it doesn’t bother me: there is a sense of occasion and a burning purpose here that is missing from so many recordings of this work and which merely adds to the excitement of a conception that builds so inexorably to the work’s peroration that I guarantee, no matter how familiar you are with the concerto, it will make your eyes burn. If this isn’t the greatest performance on disc, it is certainly now my personal benchmark.
Equally impressive readings of both Opp 23 and 44 on a single disc are as rare as hen’s teeth but that’s what we have here, for Matsuev and
Gergiev give a similarly blistering account of the G major Concerto. Of other one-disc pairings, Moiseiwitsch and George Weldon (APR, 3/97) are hors de combat sonically and, in Op 44, musically: Siloti’s edition, with its ‘authentic’ rewrites and brutal cuts, so long de rigeur, is thankfully no longer in favour as it was in 1944 (and would remain for many years to come); worst affected is the ‘triple concerto’ second movement, with its extended passages for solo violin and cello reduced by Siloti from 332 bars to 141. Sadly, Cherkassy (DG, 7/99, with two different conductors), in what are otherwise treasurable accounts, also suffers from this cut. On two-disc sets, Gary Graffman and George Szell’s (Sony, 1/06) thrilling first and third movements are compromised by a Siloti second movement; Peter Donohoe and Rudolf Barshai (EMI, 2/91), one of the first recordings to eschew Siloti, is short on adrenaline but features the young Nigel Kennedy and Steven Isserlis; Oleg Marshev and Owain Arwel Hughes (Danacord, A/07) offer Tchaikovsky’s original but are lumbered with two deeply ordinary soloists; Stephen Hough and Osmo Vänskä’s live recording (Hyperion, 5/10) suffers from less than ideal sound and I’m not convinced by Hough’s headlong sprint in the finale after the fermata at bar 483.
Click on a CD cover to buy/stream from
GRAMOPHONE RECORDINGS OF THE YEAR 2014 11