Skip to main content
Read page text
page 24
time here, though in hi s case the biggest competition might be ENO. There's a sense in which 'international ' opera is more a t risk becau se just as there are more cities in Britain with opera companies, so there are more cit ies in the wor ld which the jet plane gives a great singer access to. I agree with Bernard that the th in g we have to concentrate on is the notion of proYiding 'quality', and that means that 'international' is defined as opera in the orig ina l language performed by the best ta lents that it is possible to muster. What we ha ve decided to do, as a matter of po li cy approved by the board , is to t ry and set up in t he house a company, a fami ly of singers and (this is now looking seven years ahead) ensure that the suppl y of talent that \\'e need for the productions \\'e p lan can come partl y from people who have a prior obligation to the house. ot for the who le of each season, because we are talking about people who sing in Zurich and Geneva and Lyons, bur we do want to try and maintain standards nor just by in viting the very greatest nam es to visit us, but by holding on to some of the greatest and potentially greatest names here, and then to som e extent creati ng a repertory, or part of each season's repertory, designed to bring our the best of what they have to give. That will rake a great deal of rime and patience to get right, because we're not going to top in vitin g Domingo. ML: That was something I was going to ask. T o many people in the street, opera and an 'international' opera house means the opportunity to see Mr P. and Mme C., and in Britain they're on ly going to come here . Is it a job squaring that expectatio n as \\'ell? JI: It is, and for a particular reason. It's diffi cult to fir it all in, especially if-as is probable-\\·e do marginally fewer performances of opera in a season . For example, this year \\'e ha\'e 150-odd performances. I think the optimum number we should aim at is nearer 120 . Thi s has been an exceptional year, Joh n Tooley's last season, \\'ith a great deal of \\·onderful stuff on display. But one of the things that the hou se has suffered from in the last several years is, nor ro mince words , second-rare re vivals . I \,·a nt to cur down on that a bit, and I \\'ant to irn·ire the Royal Ballet, which needs longer and more extended runs than it 's recently been ab le to ha,·e, to make up the difference. 1 see a small shift in the balance between opera and baller in t he house. ow, if you cut the number of performances down to 120 and also tr y to get slig htl y longer runs of each production, then you limi t the opportunities to fit everybody you \\'Ould like to hear in the house in any one season. Bernard? BH: Of course we are aware of our special sit uation, which can be both a n a d vantage and a disad,·antage . They ha\e a totally different syste m in Germany and Austria: ,,·e are not a repertory theatre, "'e are a sragione theatre. In German y you ha,·e seven opera performances a "'eek, i\'lr X flies in and ivl iss Y flies in , they hake hands with the conductor, go on stage, stan d where the assistant producer tells them , an d that ' it. Whatever the results are, we do have our three-week p reparation period, and t hat means you can 't a lway get t he people yo u \,·ant. Some singers simp ly don't want to rehearse for three "eeks for a re,i,·al. Bur " ·e ha,·e got to impro,·e our revi,·als . It is good that Lyubimov came back fo r Jenufa. That 's very important . \Ve should a lways t ry and get the original producer back. PF: It 's a great problem balancing the great si ngers in demand a ll round t he " ·or ld ; they get to a point in their careers \,·hen they ha,·e learnt their roles and say 'that 's enough time here , because I a lso have to be there and duty ca lls'. Bur coming back to your question, the key to the future is standards. How do we impro,·e those 406
page 25
standard ? They start with conductors, they have to, with the orchestra, the chorus and whoever's in the pit. That' the starting point. To achieve standards, we've got to look at what we might regard as the quick reviva l , which has perhaps dominated the house rather a lot in recent years, and it has done so because we have had to make money: we have had to fi ll in performances because if you have people permanent ly employed, then every time you perform you improve your box-office situation. So when we look towards 1989 and beyond to 1993, or whenever the closure is , the key mu t be to make sure that every piece goes on for a particular reason . You come down to, say, 16 or 17 works maximum a year . You start with conductors. Then you look at British singers : how many can you use and at the ame time leave gaps for ome of the great international singers? Of course not everybody i like Domingo. There are fine singers from overseas who come and work here , like Claudio Desderi in Figaro . It's a question of balance all the time . The priority is to see how best to u e those British singers who are prepared to give us time, while still ensuring that they ha ve the opportunity to go and develop elsewhere, because the reason British singers have developed to the extent t hat they have i because they have had the chance to sing abroad. 1 reall y don't belie\'e whl:!n you talk about a 'company' today you mean, in a house that has only 16 or 17 production a yea r , a s inger who is going to sit here all the time. Obviou ly the younger ones, yes, because it is part of our job to develop them . But it's a question of looking over a three - or four-year period, talking to Tom Allen, Marie McLaughlin , Ann Murray, Diana Montague and o on, a king them what roles would work well for them between 1989 and 1993 , what roles we should advance them in h re at Covent Garden , and a t th e same tim e dovetailing these ro les in with what they may do overseas. To come back to a point that Jeremy made about a famil y, about making singers fee l they are part of Covent Garden, that Covent Garden is their home, and that they are going to focus their work around what they will do in this country. This leads to another point. If you go back to the '60s, you find that there was a tremendous di vide between the London houses. There were certain British singers who only appeared at Sadler's Wells or the Coliseum, and certain singers who only appeared at Covent Garden . That has blown wide open, and it's one of the best things that's happened here. Thomas Allen, Philip Langridge, all these people appear equally at the Coliseum and Covent Garden , and then go to Scotland. So we have to examine very carefully what we mean by 'a company' s inger. I think it 's a singer who is giving a commitment to this house over an extended period, a singer with whom we have talked in great detail about the roles they will sing, bearing in mind that we still-i f we are going to have two houses in London-leave the spaces where a Domingo , or a Pavarotti, or whoever, can come and sing. RM: You mentioned Desderi who, whatever else he is, is not a Domingo: he doesn't ha ve that sort of following. But he does strike me a s being a 'family'singer, someone with whom you are de veloping a relationship. PF: Bernard started to develop it with him at Gl yndebourne. BH: He's a very good company singer. RM : And h e wants to come and work here. PF: So do singers like Carol Vaness. There are a number of such singers, and of course when they are looking at new roles, they want to come to a house where they are go in g to get the facilities and the time really to learn a role. One of the most 407

standard ? They start with conductors, they have to, with the orchestra, the chorus and whoever's in the pit. That' the starting point. To achieve standards, we've got to look at what we might regard as the quick reviva l , which has perhaps dominated the house rather a lot in recent years, and it has done so because we have had to make money: we have had to fi ll in performances because if you have people permanent ly employed, then every time you perform you improve your box-office situation. So when we look towards 1989 and beyond to 1993, or whenever the closure is , the key mu t be to make sure that every piece goes on for a particular reason . You come down to, say, 16 or 17 works maximum a year . You start with conductors. Then you look at British singers : how many can you use and at the ame time leave gaps for ome of the great international singers? Of course not everybody i like Domingo. There are fine singers from overseas who come and work here , like Claudio Desderi in Figaro . It's a question of balance all the time . The priority is to see how best to u e those British singers who are prepared to give us time, while still ensuring that they ha ve the opportunity to go and develop elsewhere, because the reason British singers have developed to the extent t hat they have i because they have had the chance to sing abroad. 1 reall y don't belie\'e whl:!n you talk about a 'company' today you mean, in a house that has only 16 or 17 production a yea r , a s inger who is going to sit here all the time. Obviou ly the younger ones, yes, because it is part of our job to develop them . But it's a question of looking over a three - or four-year period, talking to Tom Allen, Marie McLaughlin , Ann Murray, Diana Montague and o on, a king them what roles would work well for them between 1989 and 1993 , what roles we should advance them in h re at Covent Garden , and a t th e same tim e dovetailing these ro les in with what they may do overseas.

To come back to a point that Jeremy made about a famil y, about making singers fee l they are part of Covent Garden, that Covent Garden is their home, and that they are going to focus their work around what they will do in this country. This leads to another point. If you go back to the '60s, you find that there was a tremendous di vide between the London houses. There were certain British singers who only appeared at Sadler's Wells or the Coliseum, and certain singers who only appeared at Covent Garden . That has blown wide open, and it's one of the best things that's happened here. Thomas Allen, Philip Langridge, all these people appear equally at the Coliseum and Covent Garden , and then go to Scotland. So we have to examine very carefully what we mean by 'a company' s inger. I think it 's a singer who is giving a commitment to this house over an extended period, a singer with whom we have talked in great detail about the roles they will sing, bearing in mind that we still-i f we are going to have two houses in London-leave the spaces where a Domingo , or a Pavarotti, or whoever, can come and sing. RM: You mentioned Desderi who, whatever else he is, is not a Domingo: he doesn't ha ve that sort of following. But he does strike me a s being a 'family'singer, someone with whom you are de veloping a relationship.

PF: Bernard started to develop it with him at Gl yndebourne. BH: He's a very good company singer. RM : And h e wants to come and work here.

PF: So do singers like Carol Vaness. There are a number of such singers, and of course when they are looking at new roles, they want to come to a house where they are go in g to get the facilities and the time really to learn a role. One of the most

407

My Bookmarks


Skip to main content