Skip to main content
Read page text
page 10
There were political issues ... THESE ARE ABSURD DOCTRINES WITH DISMAYING IMPLICATIONS . .. THEY DEPRIVE THE MINO OF ITS DEFENCES AGAINST DANGEROUSLY IRRATIONAL IDEOLOGIES AND REGIMES. [Prof. David Mellor and others - anti-Derrid a flysheet] ... and question s of interpretati on. TO CALL HIS THINKING NIHILIST WOULD BE TO FLATTER IT BY SAYING IT WAS INTELLIGIBLE. [Prof. Barry Smith in The Times]
page 11
19 academics summed up the indictments in a letter to The Times: Derrida Degree a Question of Honour .. . M. Derrida describes himself as a philosophe r. Hi s influence. howeve r. has been to a s t riking degree almos t e nt.ire ly in fie lds outside philosophy. ln lhe eyes of philosophers, and c e r tainl y those workin g in leading d e p artm e nt s of philosophy througho ut the world , M. Derrida·s work does not meet accepted standards of c la rity and rigour. M. Derrida"s writings seem to co n s is t in no s m a ll p art o f e laborate jokes and pun s . He seem s to have com e c lose to making a career o ut o f tra nsla ting imo the ac ademic s phere tr ic ks a nd g immicks s imilar 10 those o f the Dada is t s o r th e co ncrete poets . Many French philosophers see in M . Derrida o nly c a use for s il e nl embarrassment , hi s antics having contributed s ignificantl y LO the widespread impression tha t contemporary French philosophy is lillle mo re than a n o bjec t o f ridi c ule. M. De rrid a's volumino u s writings in our view stre tc h the no rm a l fo rm s o f acad e mi c scho larship beyond recog ni t ion. Above a ll , his works e mploy a wrill e n s ty le 1ha t defi es comprehensio n. Whe n the effo rt is made to penetrate it. it becomes c lear that, whe r e co he re nt assertio ns are be ing made at a ll , these a re e ithe r fa lse or trivial. Barry Smith (Edito r, The Mo nist) and colleagues a t the lmernati onalc Akademie for Philosophic, Lichtens te in . May 6 th. [s igned by 18 others] Derrida is accused of obfuscation, trickery and charlatanism. He's not a philosopher, he's a flim-flam artist. And strangely, his trivial joking gimmickry is seen as a powerful threat to philosophy a corrosion rn the very foundations of intellectual life. g

There were political issues ...

THESE ARE ABSURD DOCTRINES WITH DISMAYING IMPLICATIONS . .. THEY DEPRIVE THE MINO OF ITS DEFENCES AGAINST DANGEROUSLY IRRATIONAL

IDEOLOGIES AND REGIMES. [Prof. David Mellor and others - anti-Derrid a flysheet]

... and question s of interpretati on.

TO CALL HIS THINKING NIHILIST WOULD BE TO FLATTER IT BY SAYING IT WAS INTELLIGIBLE.

[Prof. Barry Smith in The Times]

My Bookmarks


Skip to main content