demonstrates the chiastic patterning in Poem 64, where the eight scenes of the poem create a form of chiastic framing:
i. The courtship of Peleus and Thetis (lines 1–31) ii. The wedding feast, Part i (lines 32–50) iii. Ariadne’s search (lines 51–116) iv. Ariadne’s lament (lines 117–202) Bridge: The Judgment of Jove (lines 203–207) v. Aegeus’ lament (lines 208–250) v i . Iacchus’ search (lines 251–265) vii. The wedding feast, Part ii (lines 266–382) viii. Conclusion (lines 383–410) The crucial moment comes at the ‘bridge’, when Jove delivers his judgment on Theseus’s neglect of Ariadne and his failure to replace his ship’s black sail with a white one, as his father asked (a signal of Theseus’s triumphant return after slaughtering the Minotaur). The poem hinges on line 205, the central line to the poem and a pivot within the three ‘books’: ‘the Heavenly Power nodded unstoppable / approval’ – a line that seems straightforwardly positive, a god granting a wish to Ariadne, but which leads to the immediate suicide of Aegeus, and a darkening of the second half of the poem and of ‘book three’. These kinds of decisions on the ordering of the poems seem more like those of an author than a later editor. They are also choices consistent with the poems’ internal logic and aesthetic, and therefore more likely authorial than editorial. In short, alternative arrangements of the poems are simply not as convincing, or as successful, as the ordering of the three books, as they have been handed down. In the present volume, the differences in metrics between these ‘books’ are shadowed by differences in syllable count, to produce a line-by-line translation. My version of the first book, in which Catullus uses a variety of metres, is the freest in its treatment of the poems’ literal meanings, physical shapes and layout. These xii . catullus