Skip to main content
Read page text


Bartók . Veress Bartók Piano Quintet, Sz23a Veress String Triob a Barnabás Kelemen, Vilde Frang vns aKatalin Kokas, bLawrence Power vas Nicolas Altstaedt vc b Alexander Lonquich pf Alpha F ALPHA458 (62’ • DDD)

If you pan back to 1954 in search of the year’s finest music, Vaughan

Williams’s Tuba Concerto and Lutosπawski’s Concerto for Orchestra are among the best-known highlights. But what about Sándor Veress’s only String Trio? It flirts with atonality much as Alban Berg did, except that, whereas Berg echoed Mahlerian expressionism, with Veress experimentation encircles Hungarian folk music. Even the Trio’s slow-fast binary form recalls the rhapsodies of Liszt and Bartók, though music near the start of the second section recalls the firefly Scherzo from Prokofiev’s Third Symphony (here Frang and her colleagues really do play up the resemblance – whether consciously or not I couldn’t tell you).

The level of invention is startling throughout, with the players being instructed to rap on the bodies of the instruments with their knuckles. The principal rhythmic ‘riff’ appears in various guises, bowed, plucked and drummed. But what’s most amazing is the work’s high level of concentration: although a mere 20 minutes in length, by the time you’re through with it you feel as if you’ve experienced an entire Mahler symphony. So much is said, so many varied sounds shared between three. The only work I can think of that has a similar effect is by Veress’s principal creative guide, Bartók, his Third Quartet. I’d say with some degree of confidence that this Trio approaches that same level of attainment, vying with Schoenberg’s Trio in its profound effect, while Vilde Frang, Lawrence Power and Nicolas Altstaedt grant it a superb performance, the best I’ve yet heard in fact. Memorable rival recordings include members of the Merel Quartet (Cybèle


Records), which, though well played, isn’t on quite on the same level, while Ensemble Equilibres (Hungaroton) underline the work’s Bartókian roots. Neither threatens the supremacy of Frang et al, though it’s useful to know that both are programmed in the context of other chamber works by Veress.

Bartók’s Piano Quintet, a product of 1903 and an altogether more modest affair, summons Brahms and Strauss as obvious influences. The composer was in his early twenties when he wrote the work but a couple of decades later, when he performed it as part of a programme including more characteristic pieces, Bartók was incensed by audience members who rated the Quintet highest of all. He even hurled the score to the ground in disgust and was thought to have destroyed it, though fortunately for us the Quintet, an enjoyable piece by any standards, survived his anger. At times the brooding Adagio suggests Bluebeard’s shadow before giving way to the temperamental finale, which accelerates gypsy-style (the principal theme harbours a sure reference to Brahms’s Zigeunerlieder), and surveying numerous expressive techniques and tempo changes, including a trim fughetta. Barnabás Kelemen and friends keep the camp fires alight with playing that is both intense and dynamic, whereas the slower music has a dreamily rhapsodising quality about it.

Runners-up on CD include Jeno˝ Jandó with the Kodály Quartet (Naxos, 10/95), a good performance though nowhere near as vivid or fiery as the performance under review. Nor does Hungaroton’s worthy recording with Csilla Szabó and the Tatrai Quartet prove a formidable contender. So I think it fair to say that Kelemen, Frang, Katalin Kokas, Altstaedt and Alexander Lonquich sell this lovable product of youthful creative excess more securely than any of their predecessors on disc, certainly any that I have encountered. But what makes this CD unmissable is the Veress Trio, a masterpiece and a performance to match. I’ve already pencilled it in as a potential contender for next year’s Gramophone Awards. The annotation is excellent, including a fine essay on the Trio by Sándor’s son Claudio, also a composer. Rob Cowan

Beethoven Three Violin Sonatas, Op 12. Variations on ‘Se vuol ballare’ from Mozart’s ‘The Marriage of Figaro’, WoO40 James Ehnes vn Andrew Armstrong pf Onyx F ONYX4177 (68’ • DDD)

With some discs, you can just tell that everything’s going to go like a dream. And it’s not just that I’ve never yet heard a disappointing recording from James Ehnes and Andrew Armstrong. The energy and bounce of the way they play the opening flourish of Beethoven’s Sonata Op 12 No 1 initially made me start; but within that opening phrase you can feel Ehnes applying just enough articulation to make it clear that this is going to be part of the musical argument, as well as the dramatic opening gesture that the 27-year-old Beethoven surely intended.

The freshness and spontaneity of these interpretations is unfaltering, as is the instantaneous rapport and subtle, crystal-clear tonal beauty of the pair’s playing. They lean into the Andante of No 1 in a way that allows both grace and a lilting sense of momentum, and launch Op 12 No 2 as if in medias res: with a dancing scherzo-like swing in which Armstrong’s left hand manages to provide both a rhythmic springboard for his partner’s phrasing and a frequently droll punchline to Beethoven’s youthful witticisms.

These are, after all, ‘Sonatas for Pianoforte and Violin’ – a paradox that I’ve rarely heard so masterfully resolved on modern instruments. These players are simply on the same page as each other. The slow movements of Nos 2 and 3 are simultaneously intimate and pregnant with a sense of greater things; and the central tempest of No 3’s first movement is handled without any loss either of tension or clarity. The variations on ‘Se vuol ballare’, deliciously played, make an irresistibly playful encore to a disc which should give all but the most humourless of listeners consistent and unqualified delight. Richard Bratby

My Bookmarks

    Skip to main content