exhibitions
67
Installation view of the series Nichols Gorge Walk, Kosciuszko National Park by Amanda Williams.
where the responsibility falls for restitution and repair. Continuing the curatorial thread of obstruction is the work of Atong Atem. An artist of South Sudanese heritage living in Naarm (Melbourne), Atem’s work focuses the aesthetic strategies used by young migrants to braid together local and transnational cultural influences. Atem’s series Monstera Obliqua (2021) combines previously unseen portraits, and documentation of the artist’s daily local walks (primarily through foraged flora) during Covid lockdown. Atem’s work is introduced in the space with text which explains that the series considers ‘…how and where black folk exist, feel comfortable, feel natural, and feel welcome…’ and the role of photography in this process. This is a significant as the images in Monstera Obliqua call to mind visual histories and practices of colonialism (namely botanical studies and photographic portraits) that imposed a sense of ‘natural order’ over bodies and landscapes. When considered alongside the fact that the series was produced during a protracted period of intensive lockdown in Melbourne, the visual legacies underscoring these images present an important question – namely, what are the visual processes we enact in order to connect to place? And, how is this negotiated in a context of settler colonialism? Refusing to identify the people in her portraits, or to identify specific geographical details in her work, the strength of Atem’s piece comes in the fact that it ultimately operates as a subtle subversion of colonial visual histories and photography’s role within them. The engagement with found objects and the historical legacy of photography as colonial instrument is also evident in Amanda Williams’ series Nichols Gorge Walk, Kosciuszko National Park (2021). Using fogged paper (in some cases decades old) and expired chemicals, Williams’ faint black and white photographs capture the empty landscape of Kosciuszko as through it is in the process of disappearance. Describing her work as a ‘feminist landscape’, Williams’ photographs obscure any attempts to survey the land and to pinpoint specific geographies, thereby undermining the capacity of photography to operate as an instrument of surveillance and control. Devoid of allegory and with the clarity of the images removed, Williams’ photographs are milky and ghostly in appearance, evoking a distant and faded memory – one that is as melancholic as it is menacing. This feeling is amplified by the large-scale of Williams’ landscape images that immediately called to mind Australian Impressionist painting (for example Arthur Streeton’s seminal 1891 work Fire’s On). Australian Impressionism has been understood as creating a distinct national art movement by focusing on the vastness of the landscape and, latterly, for forging a lingering image of Australian identity that obscures colonial realities. Drawing reference both to photographic processes of surveillance and control, and the fraught legacy of landscape within Australian art history, Williams’ works prompt a powerful enquiry into how visualisation over the landscape reflects systems of power.
As an Australian living in the UK, I walked away from Whose Land is It? struck by the poignancy of the location of the exhibition – the Liverpool waterfront being the gateway to Britain’s industrial and colonial past. Whilst an exhibition centred on the issue of land ownership would have undoubtedly benefited from the inclusion of a First Nations artist, Whose Land is It? is to be commended for the showcasing a diverse and exciting new generation of Australian photographic artists, and for the sensitive handling of layered histories of dispossession and geographical entanglements, and the role of photography within them.
— Chrisoula Lionis