in which those novels were written. Their worth is greater than mere quaint entertainment, though God knows they are amusing in the truest and broadest sense that term will bear – and some at least of their capacity to amuse is consciously exercised. Their integrity of purpose deserves respect. It is possible – and fun, for goodness’ sake – to trot a Baedeker around a city, a cathedral or a picture gallery, noting just how much is still there and how much more the anonymous author of 1870 or 1890 manages to tell you about it than most modern guides. Their style – urbane, vivacious, sly or sardonic – is frankly better than most of us tourists deserve. They are, as I have tried to show, creative achievements, not simply an insensate battering of the consciousness with salvoes of unsorted fact. They are my comfort food, my medicine for the hard hours of sleeplessness. To drag in Jane Austen once more, they are my equivalent of Sir Walter Elliot’s copy of the peerage in Persuasion, which offered him ‘occupation for an idle hour and consolation in a distressed one’. Like Sir Walter’s, my faculties are ‘aroused into admiration and respect’, but in this case it is for the selfless energy and dedication shown by the writers, editors and translators of these books. If, like the Kellynch baronet, I feel ‘any unwelcome sensations . . . changing naturally into pity and contempt’, then these must be for those who can honestly find no species of enchantment in Baedeker’s reassuring bulk or in
102