Skip to main content
Read page text
page 172
– Fighting for Peace – W ars, however, are not always fought in pur- suit or defence of territory. A ‘tariff war’ may lead to an ultimatum. Then which nation is attacking and which defending? In a sense each is defend­ing its rights, for each will proclaim the right to live, and allege that the other is endangering it. Wars may be declared, as Austria declared war on Servia, in defence of some supposed prestige. It was generally admitted that Austria had the right to some sort of ‘satisfaction’ for the ‘insult’ of Serajevo, and it was, in fact, the clash between Austria’s ‘defence’ of her original claim and Servia’s ‘defence’ against an excessive claim which led to the Great War. It is clear then, that, whatever the origin of a war, each country can protest that she is not the aggressor; each country can claim that she is ‘resisting’ an unfair demand, ‘defending’ her prestige, or ‘repelling’ an attack upon her rights. It is also clear that with the modern facilities for organizing and distributing lies, which every government possesses and none scruples to use, the justice of a cause can be firmly established in the minds of all nationals fighting for it. If the countries of Europe are going to limit themselves in the future to defensive wars; if they are going to limit 152
page 173
– Fighting for Peace – themselves to wars for which God’s approval has been obtained in advance by their clergy; they will not be pledged to one single war less. To justify defensive war is automatically to justify the next war in which one’s own country is engaged, and is, therefore, automatically to justify war. But there is another reason why any distinction made between aggressive and defensive prepara­tions for war leaves no hope of peace. As I said in a previous chapter, no nation trusts the word of another nation. It is not surprising that states­men should be cynical about the good faith of each other, when they have been given such abundant reason for cynicism. If there is one sin which brings its own punishment, it is the sin of lying. Truth is the supreme virtue, and it is because we have allowed politicians to neglect it at the call of a false patriotism that we have been burdened with this nightmare of war. For it is the simple fact that no statesman, no general, has ever hesitated to lie if the good of the state seemed to demand it. When periodically there is an outcry against the sale of honours, every leader of every party blandly professes ignorance of such sale. They are lying; we know that they are lying; but it is not a matter of adverse comment. The convention is that their personal honour is untouched if the lies which they tell are in the interest of the state. When, in war, a general orders an attack which is repulsed with hideous losses, he announces that ‘all goes well with 153

– Fighting for Peace –

W ars, however, are not always fought in pur- suit or defence of territory. A ‘tariff war’ may lead to an ultimatum. Then which nation is attacking and which defending? In a sense each is defend­ing its rights, for each will proclaim the right to live, and allege that the other is endangering it. Wars may be declared, as Austria declared war on Servia, in defence of some supposed prestige. It was generally admitted that Austria had the right to some sort of ‘satisfaction’ for the ‘insult’ of Serajevo, and it was, in fact, the clash between Austria’s ‘defence’ of her original claim and Servia’s ‘defence’ against an excessive claim which led to the Great War.

It is clear then, that, whatever the origin of a war, each country can protest that she is not the aggressor; each country can claim that she is ‘resisting’ an unfair demand, ‘defending’ her prestige, or ‘repelling’ an attack upon her rights. It is also clear that with the modern facilities for organizing and distributing lies, which every government possesses and none scruples to use, the justice of a cause can be firmly established in the minds of all nationals fighting for it. If the countries of Europe are going to limit themselves in the future to defensive wars; if they are going to limit

152

My Bookmarks


Skip to main content